Why is it an enforced human right to be inhumane?
a short thought experiment
Honest question, do you think it’s morally valid to hold a boundary just for yourself?
Say you reflexively shutdown and it seems to be sticking around, regarding communication with someone who wants to talk, but you could rationally acknowledge the other party didn’t truly deserve to have earned it, and they are the kind of person who wants to work things out and is seeking that, would you feel right in holding the boundary still?
Is it okay to force people to seek self-healing with therapists because you don’t feel capable of having a difficult conversation they feel incapable of moving forward freely without?
If yes, would it change your opinion if that set them on a course for psychological self-destruction and grief which would change their life for the worse? What if your boundary had them carrying anxiety which caused them to need medications to compensate, and those solutions dampened their life in other ways? Would you change your mind?
If no, why? Why do you feel the opinion that it is a human right to not converse and mediate something painful, when another is in need, is more valid than the alternative opinion?
Is it manipulative to fight for humane action with earnest feeling?
Is society taking hypocrites sides freedom?
When we chose to be bad people and selfish—can we admit it, and not be even worse by gaslighting the people who have human emotions in need of compassion?
